Back to Limb SalvageLimb Salvage · Megaprosthesis

Tumour Endoprosthesis Reconstruction

A tumour endoprosthesis (megaprosthesis) is a large metallic implant designed to replace bone and joint segments removed during cancer surgery. Modern modular designs restore immediate function and allow rapid mobilisation after limb salvage surgery — for ≈95% of patients requiring reconstruction.

What types of endoprostheses are available?

Adult standard endoprostheses include:

  • Distal femur — the most common, replacing the knee joint with a fixed-hinge design.
  • Proximal tibia — includes a tibial tubercle attachment for the patellar tendon.
  • Proximal femur — replaces the hip joint with an acetabular component.
  • Intercalary — replaces mid-shaft segments while preserving native joints.
  • Total femur — replaces the entire femur from hip to knee.

Expandable endoprostheses for children can be lengthened non-invasively with an external magnetic coil, or via a small surgical lengthening. Studies show mean lengthening of 31.6 mm across sessions with an 84% limb salvage rate.

Case stories

Real reconstructions, real patients

Four cases illustrating how tumour endoprostheses restore the limb and life of patients across diagnoses and age groups.

Ewing's sarcoma · Limb salvage

Tumour prosthesis for Ewing's sarcoma

Wide resection of an Ewing's sarcoma followed by modular megaprosthesis reconstruction — restoring limb length and joint function after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Paediatric · Distal femur

Distal femur osteosarcoma in a child

A growing child treated for lower femur osteosarcoma with a tumour endoprosthesis that preserves the limb and addresses future growth.

Chondrosarcoma · Proximal femur

Hip tumour prosthesis for chondrosarcoma

Proximal femur replacement with a tumour hip prosthesis after resection of a chondrosarcoma — restoring hip stability and walking.

Composite reconstruction

Osteosarcoma — prosthesis with plastic flap cover

Tumour endoprosthesis combined with a plastic surgery flap to ensure durable soft-tissue cover over the implant after wide osteosarcoma resection.

Modular vs custom 3D-printed prostheses

  • Modular: pre-manufactured components assembled in theatre — standard sizes, shorter waiting time, lower cost, 10-year survival 58–70%.
  • Custom 3D-printed: patient-specific titanium with porous surfaces for osseointegration — perfect anatomical fit, joint preservation, and manufactured in 2–3 weeks versus months for traditional custom implants.

Patient journey — Priya, 12, Delhi

Priya was diagnosed with osteosarcoma of her distal femur after a confirmatory open biopsy. After neoadjuvant chemotherapy she underwent tumour resection with 2 cm margins (frozen-section confirmed), a non-invasive magnetic expandable endoprosthesis, and a gastrocnemius muscle flap for biopsy-scar coverage. Rehabilitation began on day 2. Over three years her prosthesis was lengthened 8 times (4 mm per session) in the outpatient clinic. She achieved 110° knee flexion, returned to badminton, and at 5-year follow-up remains disease-free with equal leg lengths.

Complications and how we manage them

Early (0–6 months): infection 8–14%, wound healing problems 15–20% (higher with adjuvant radiotherapy), dislocation 4%.

Late (>6 months): aseptic loosening 5.6% in modern modular implants; expandable mechanism failure 10–15% in paediatric implants.

Acute infections (<3 weeks) are treated with debridement and implant retention (DAIR) with a 60–80% success rate. Chronic infections undergo two-stage revision with an antibiotic spacer. The 10-year cumulative amputation risk is just 11%.

How long do these implants last?

  • 5-year implant survival: 70–80%
  • 10-year implant survival: 58–66%
  • Major revision risk at 10 years: 18%
  • Expandable prosthesis 5-year survival: 75–85% before conversion to adult prosthesis at skeletal maturity

Functional outcomes

  • MSTS scores average 84% (range 67–90%) for modern prostheses.
  • Knee flexion typically 90–120°.
  • Cemented implants allow full weight bearing within days.
  • Distal femur reconstructions offer the best functional results; proximal tibia has slightly reduced strength due to patellar-tendon attachment.
Life after surgery

Back on their feet

Short clips of patients walking and returning to daily life after tumour endoprosthesis reconstruction.

Functional outcome

Confident walking with a rotating-platform prosthesis

Patient walking confidently after reconstruction with an imported rotating-platform tumour prosthesis — smooth gait and good knee control.

Adolescent recovery

Teenager back on her feet after cancer surgery

A teenager treated for bone cancer with a tumour prosthesis — early mobilisation and return to daily activities.

Recovery roadmap

  1. 0–2 weeks: ICU monitoring 24–48 h, multimodal analgesia, early mobilisation with physiotherapy.
  2. 2–6 weeks: progressive weight bearing, range-of-motion exercises, adjuvant therapy if planned.
  3. 6 weeks–6 months: strengthening, functional training, return to daily activities and sport clearance.
  4. Expandable lengthening: 10–15 min outpatient procedure, no anaesthesia, every 6–12 months as needed.

Take-home summary

Tumour endoprosthesis reconstruction delivers excellent limb salvage with good function for adults and children. Modular designs achieve 70–80% survival at 5 years; expandable prostheses keep growing children equal-legged; and 3D-printed custom implants represent the next step in personalised reconstruction.

References

  1. PMC2947697 — Late complications and survival of endoprosthetic reconstruction (2010).
  2. PMC6394191 — Growing without pain: non-invasive expandable prosthesis outcomes (2019).
  3. PMC6907292 — Likelihood of tumour endoprosthesis complications over time (2019).
  4. PMC2958285 — Expanding endoprosthesis for paediatric musculoskeletal malignancy (2009).
  5. PMC9561186 — Application of 3D printing implants for bone tumours (2022).
  6. World J Orthop — Expandable endoprostheses in skeletally immature patients (2024).
  7. PMC9047786 — Evaluation of tumour prostheses over time and complications (2022).
  8. PMC4133475 — Treatment of acute periprosthetic infections with prosthesis retention (2014).
  9. PMC4209493 — Use of megaprostheses for reconstruction of large skeletal defects (2014).
  10. PMC4317408 — Survival of modern knee tumour megaprostheses (2015).